FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG SITE

OCCUPY REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE

OCCUPY THE ROAD TO POTUS

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Romney's Gold Medal in Olympic Outsourcing


ABCNews.com


Jul 26, 2012 6:00am

Made in China: Olympic Pin Shaped Like Mitt Romney’s Face

by Chris Good

abc 2002 romney salt lake pins kb 120725 wblog Made in China: Olympic Pin Shaped Like Mitt Romneys Face
Commemorative pins from the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics


After controversy arose over Ralph Lauren’s 2012 U.S. Olympic uniforms’ Chinese origins, Mitt Romney told ABC’s Jonathan Karl that the issue is “extraneous” to the focus of the games.

“The Olympic games are about the athletes and we’re going to watch the athlete perform and these other matters are extraneous I think to the heart of the matter, which is how well will our athletes do?” Romney said. “I’m not going to get into the uniform issue.”

Like the uniforms in 2012 and in 2002, when Mitt Romney ran the Salt Lake Olympics much of its official memorabilia was manufactured overseas, including a 9/11 commemorative pin and another fashioned in the shape of Romney’s head.

Salt Lake 2002 Olympics paraphernalia obtained by ABC bears “Made in China” and “Made in Bangladesh” stamps.

Two hats, made by Illinois-based American Needle, were manufactured in Bangladesh. A collectible tin and several pins, including a cartoonish Romney likeness and a 9/11 pin bearing the words “United We Stand,” were manufactured in China by Aminco, the U.S. Olympic Committee’s sole licensee for lapel pins, according to the company’s website. A stuffed animal was made in China by Fischer Price, and a Salt Lake 2002 tote bag was made in Taiwan.
While Aminco, the pin-maker, produced licensed memorabilia for the U.S. Olympic Committee, Romney did not work for that organization. He served as president of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee, which planned the games.
We’ve found no mention of the memorabilia by Romney, a businessman brought in to save the Olympics from scandal and fiscal peril, but he did address the notion of cutting costs by buying from China in another area of Olympic organizing.

Get more pure politics at ABC News.com/Politics and a lighter take on the news at OTUSNews.com

When Romney’s Salt Lake Organizing Committee developed the Gateway plaza in Salt Lake City, offering patrons and residents the chance to buy bricks for $100 and have their names inscribed, the committee used granite bricks from China, despite an abundance of granite in the nearby Wasatch mountains, the Salt Lake Tribune reported at the time.

“It’s extraordinary,” Romney told the paper, “but it’s cheaper to get it from China.”

abc 2002 games china labels kb 120725 wblog Made in China: Olympic Pin Shaped Like Mitt Romneys Face
Labels on Salt Lake 2002 memorabilia


 The Progress Report logo

A Gold Medal in Outsourcing

A Closer Look at Mitt Romney’s Olympics

When the Olympics come to America, it’s rightfully a source of pride for all Americans. And Mitt Romney certainly likes to tout his experience running the 2002 Winter Olympics. He was so proud of the job he did, he became the first ever Olympic leader to personally commission his own Olympic pin. In fact, he had an entire line of pins made in his likeness. And like many things at Romney’s Olympics, they were made in China.


Let’s take a closer at how Mitt Romney ran the Olympics, including a few things Romney doesn’t tout out on the stump.
Outsourcing
It’s no surprise that an outsourcing pioneer like Mitt Romney would outsource Olympic gear to foreign countries like China instead of making it here in America, but the extent of Romney’s outsourcing is truly shocking. Items he outsourced to foreign countries include:
  • Commemorative 9/11 pins — Made in China
  • Uniforms for Olympic torchbearers — Made in Burma
  • Stuffed animals — Made in China
  • Hats — Made in Bangladesh
  • Tote bags — Made in Taiwan
abc 2002 games china labels kb 120725 wblog Made in China: Olympic Pin Shaped Like Mitt Romneys Face
And, in an outsourcing feat worthy of a gold medal, he even outsourced commemorative granite bricks at the Olympic plaza  – yes, bricks — to China. There’s a suburb of Salt Lake City named Granite because there’s so much of it there, but Romney got his shipped all the way from China. “It’s extraordinary, but it’s cheaper to get it from China,” Romney explained.
Romney’s Olympics? Taxpayer Money Built That
Romney and his campaign have been relentlessly attacking the president for making the obvious point that government has a role in facilitating the success of individuals and businesses large and small. It turns out that the government — and American taxpayers — had a very large role in helping Romney’s Olympics succeed. Taxpayers spent a whopping $1.5 BILLION on the games, funding which Romney claimed was necessary to pull them off:
“No matter how well we did cutting costs and raising revenue, we couldn’t have Games without the support of the federal government.”
The Salt Lake games cost taxpayers 1.5 times the amount spent on the previous seven Olympics held in the  U.S. — combined. While some money went to security, much of it was spent on infrastructure and “questionable projects of marginal value to the Salt Lake games.” Mother Jones reports that the taxpayer money was something of a slush fund for wealthy donors:
Wealthy Utahns used the games as an excuse to receive exemptions for projects that would otherwise never meet environmental standards, or to receive generous subsidies for improvements of questionable value to the games—but with serious value to future real estate developments. In one example, a wealthy developer received $3 million to build a three-mile stretch of road through his resort. Where’d he get the money? Federal funds that had been deposited in the Utah Permanent Community Impact Fund.
Indeed, Mitt Romney was so eager to get “free stuff” and other things from the government that he even became a registered lobbyist. It appears that Romney may have been lobbying some of the same legislators to whom he was giving thousands in campaign cash.
Snubbing 9/11 Widows & Orphans
The Salt Lake games came just months after 9/11. A representative of widows and orphans whose husbands and fathers were firefighters killed in the terrorist attack inquired about free or discounted tickets to games. Romney’s executive assistant twice denied the request, saying that there was a policy in place against giving away tickets. That policy apparently went out the window “six weeks later when [Romney] offered a hundred surplus tickets, valued at $ 885 each, free to Utah legislators,” according to the book The Real Romney. The former Salt Lake firefighter working with the 9/11 widows and orphans had this to say:
“I was outraged at the hypocrisy. In less than two months, he went from saying, ‘We’re going to run a tight ship’ to throwing out free tickets to a group of people who could help him politically.”
America was proud to host the Olympics in 2002, but the way Mitt Romney ran the games raises questions about how he’d run the country.

Romney in Shambles as Britain Proclaims Him Worse than Sarah Palin


Romney in Shambles as Britain Proclaims Him Worse than Sarah Palin




Iowa Poll: Trouble Ahead for Palin

The British reaction to Mitt Romney has gone from openness, to skepticism, to mocking, to concluding that Mitt Romney is worse than Sarah Palin.

Daily Mail Political Editor James Chapman has been providing the world a play by play of Romney’s British implosion via his Twitter account. Romney started things off by criticizing London’s preparedness for the Olympics. He then forgot the name of British Labour Leader Ed Miliband, and then he admitted that he had been given a secret briefing by MI6. This led the British to ask aloud if they have another George W. Bush on their hands, “Romney blunders again by revealing he’s had (supposedly) top secret briefing by John Sawers, MI6 boss. Do we have a new Dubya on our hands?”

After his visit to Whitehall, Chapman offered two of the kinder reviews of Mitt Romney, “Serious dismay in Whitehall at Romney debut. ‘Worse than Sarah Palin.’ ‘Total car crash’. Two of the kinder verdicts.” Chapman also reported another verdict from British meet and greet with Mitt, “Another verdict from one Romney meeting: ‘Apparently devoid of charm, warmth, humour or sincerity’”
Getting compared to Sarah Palin is one thing, but being called worse than Palin is an indication of the epic display of fail that Romney is putting on in London.
If you thought things couldn’t possibly get worse for Mitt Romney, you were wrong. How does one top being unfavorably compared to Sarah Palin? If you’re Mitt Romney, you get mocked in front of 60,000 people.

The Telegraph
is reporting that London Mayor Boris Johnson mocked Romney’s readiness comment, “Quite a moment from the Mayor of London Boris Johnson. Shortly after Rix had lit the flame he really went for it in Hyde Park. He referenced Mitt Romney’s ‘London isn’t ready’ quip and shot back in style. “Are we ready?” he called and the crowd went wild. There may even have been a hint of the Obama-friendly “Yes we can!” in there – he may have jumped into a winning scenario but I’ve not heard a politician get that reaction before.”

For their part, the White House rubbed salt in Romney’s wounds by pointing out that President Obama has full confidence in Britain’s ability to provide a secure Olympics. White House Spokesman Jay Carney said, “In keeping with our special relationship, the president also made it clear that he has the utmost confidence in our close friend and ally, the United Kingdom, as they finalize preparations to host the London Olympics.”

That special relationship is being put in jeopardy by a Republican nominee who can’t stop insulting the British people while making an ass out of himself. Instead of proving that he is Commander in Chief material, Romney is justifying John McCain’s 2008 selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate. To think, that the Romney campaign actually agreed to foreign policy being the the topic of the third presidential debate.

The British opinion of Romney has gone from he might be another Bush to oh my God, he makes Sarah Palin seem prepared.

Not since World War II has London seen a bombing as thorough as Mitt Romney’s.







Vampire Capitalism: When Mitt Romney Came to Town

Crooks and Liars 
Go Home



When Mitt Romney Came to Town




Mitt Romney. Was he a job creator or a corporate raider?

That's the question this film answers.

And it's not pretty...

Mitt Romney was not a capitalist during his reign at Bain. He was a predatory corporate raider. His firm didn't seek to create value. Instead, like a scavenger, Romney looked for businesses he could pick apart. Indeed, he represented the worst possible kind of predator, operating within the law but well outside the bounds of what most real capitalists consider ethical.

He is exhibit number one the left wants to use in the coming election to give capitalism a bad name.

He and his friends at Bain were bad guys. Any real capitalists should disavow Romney's 'creative destruction' model that made him wealthy at the expense of thousands of American jobs.

Mitt Romney and his cronies pioneered 'deindustrialization,' a process by which they searched out vulnerable companies, took them over, loaded them with debt, and collected obscene fees while doing so. He sent jobs overseas or killed them altogether, and then picked apart the remains - including pension funds - before the companies went bankrupt.

Some might call that the free market. Most of us think its just plain wrong.
If you wonder why America has lost so many manufacturing jobs overseas, look no further than Mitt Romney -- the King of Bain.

Think you know Mitt?

Think again...

[Via]

Monday, July 23, 2012

Mitt Romney Olympic Archive Still Off-Limits, Records Destroyed



The Blotter: Brian Ross Investigates

Mitt Romney Olympic Archive Still Off-Limits

PHOTO: Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, then-president and CEO of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee, talks about the Olympic cityscape program, Nov. 14, 2001 in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, then-president and CEO of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee, talks about the Olympic cityscape program, Nov. 14, 2001 in Salt Lake City, Utah. (George Frey/AFP/Getty Images)
More than a decade has passed since Mitt Romney presided over the Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, but the archival records from those games that were donated to the University of Utah to provide an unprecedented level of transparency about the historic event, remain off limits to the public. And some of the documents that may have shed the most light on Romney's stewardship of the Games were likely destroyed by Salt Lake Olympic officials, ABC News has learned.

The archivists involved in preparing the documents for public review told ABC News that financial documents, contracts, appointment calendars, emails and correspondence are likely not included in the 1,100 boxes of Olympic records, and will not be part of the collection that will ultimately be made public.
"We don't have that stuff," said Elizabeth Rogers, the manuscript curator at the University's Marriott Library. The decisions about what records to donate to the library were made by Olympics officials before they were shipped in 1,100 boxes to the university, she said. "That was done before we got it. I just know it wasn't a decision we made. Everything we have will be available."

The Romney campaign said it has made no effort to prevent the archive from being made public.

"Mitt Romney resigned from SLOC [the Salt Lake Organizing Committee] in early 2002 to run for governor of Massachusetts and was not involved in the decision-making regarding the final disposition of records," said Andrea Saul, a Romney spokesperson, in response to questions.

The Salt Lake City Winter Olympics represent a crucial chapter in the Romney biography -- his selection to oversee the Games came in the wake of a bribery scandal, and he was credited with overcoming that taint to stage an event that both earned respect and was financially sound. Romney eventually wrote a book about the experience -- "Turnaround" -- and frequently cites the experience as part of what qualifies him to assume the presidency.

But the absence of publicly available records that detail the decisions he made while running the games has increasingly become an uneasy subject for the library, which has for months been receiving inquiries from journalists and other researchers trying to subject Romney's version of the events to an analysis based on documents from the events.

The fact that the documents remained behind closed doors also could be politically awkward for Romney, who has already faced criticism for his decisions to keep secret some of his past tax records and some details about his investment holdings. And it carries echoes of the decision in Massachusetts by Romney aides to purchase and erase their hard drives shortly before Romney left office as governor.

University of Utah officials, however, said they have never made decisions about the Olympic papers with politics in mind. And in fact, Rogers said, they have dedicated additional staff to try and organize the documents more quickly, so they can be released to the public well before the 2012 election.

Fraser Bullock, a close friend of Romney's who oversaw the process of winding down the Games, said the fact that it has taken a decade to sort the papers is the fault of the university. "It has nothing to do with Mitt."

He said Romney's reputation was never a consideration when deciding which documents to keep. "That was not a factor in our decision-making. Everybody knew what happened with our Games. There were no hidden secrets. The media had access to our records. We had an open records policy."

That certainly was Romney's position at the time he oversaw the games. He pledged an open-book approach at the outset of his tenure as chief executive of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee. He asked reporters to expect "the most open documents policy of any enterprise." In a February 3, 2000 speech at the National Press Club he said: "All of the documents inside our organization are available to the public. Simply submit a form saying which documents you want, for instance -- I want to see all the letters written by Mr. Romney to Mr. Samaranch. You'll get 'em all."

Romney later started dialing back this pledge. In an interview with Salt Lake City Weekly later that year, he explained, "My intent was to describe our open documents policy … but I believe there is the recognition of exceptions to that." 

Olympic Documents 'Were Just Destroyed'

 

The Salt Lake Organizing Committee (SLOC) spent months negotiating its plans for gathering and archiving materials from the games, eventually signing an 11-page "Repository Agreement" with the University of Utah. The agreement, a copy of which was obtained by ABC News, includes a detailed list of documents that would be included in the university's archive. The list includes "written records of SLOC management and departments," "meeting minutes and agendas of the SLOC Board of Trustees," and "other administrative records that document the planning and staging" of the Games.

The Organizing Committee hired a university archivist, Mark Jensen, to gather documents as the Games unfolded, and to compile them into an organized collection that would be turned over to the University of Utah. Within the committee, each department was instructed to send documents and records to Jensen to be preserved. Jensen said in an interview that his work was then reviewed by lawyers to insure that proprietary information – such as how much companies bid for competitive contracts – was removed.


"I was acting under the direction of the legal department," Jensen said.

Not all the records made the cut. Decisions about which documents to submit and which to hold back ultimately were given to an SLOC attorney, and those records were sent to a separate storage site, Jensen said. "My guess is at this point all of those records were destroyed."

Kelly Flint, who was general counsel to the committee, and Bullock both confirmed this, saying the SLOC eventually destroyed any documents that included legally privileged or confidential information, including contracts with vendors and personnel records. "Anything we could disclose, of course, we couldn't destroy that. Anything that had a legal or contractual requirement to be confidential … they were just destroyed,"  Bullock said.

Asked about Romney's personal papers, such as correspondence, emails, and appointment calendars, Bullock said he did not think it was likely they were saved.

"His personal correspondence and his appointment calendar? I didn't keep mine. I don't think that's relevant to the Olympic movement," he said.

The records that survived legal scrutiny were shipped to the university in 2002 and, according to an article in the Salt Lake Tribune, were "quite systematically organized" when Jensen turned them over.

Jensen said he provided the university "a box-by-box listing of the materials. Sometimes folder-by-folder listings."

Rogers said the library has worked intermittently over the past decade to try and catalogue the 1,100 boxes of documents, but over the years it never rose to become a top priority. "We have an enormous amount to go through. It just wasn't number one on our plate," she said.

In February, when the university held an exhibition to show off the Olympic archives on the 10th anniversary of the Games, the only items that could be displayed were photographs -- a separate archive that had been organized and prepared for display. The event did not involve opening the documents for public perusal.

Walter Jones, the library's assistant head of Special Collections, said he first realized the library had a problem when a Washington Post reporter called asking for specific documents from the Olympic archive. He said he and Rogers went to see what condition the archive was in and were startled to see it largely un-sorted.

"Basically we could not field his questions," Jones said. "It was embarrassing."

Jones said the library had no intention of trying to block reporters from seeing the Olympic records.
"I think we were just caught unprepared," he said.

The library now estimates it will have the records open for public review sometime in August. As for how many of the papers will shed light on Romney's stewardship of the Games, that remains unclear. Rogers said she did not expect there would be much. "It's a lot about torch relays, Paralympics, the residences," she said. "I have not seen a whole lot of financial documentation."

Bullock, who has deep ties to Romney through not only the Olympics, but through Bain, and now as a fundraiser for the campaign, said the candidate has every reason to want the record of the Salt Lake Games preserved.

"In another few weeks it will all be totally available," Bullock said. "We've got 1,100 boxes that people can sort through. That's a lot to keep."

Lynn Packer is a freelance journalist based in North Salt Lake, Utah.

Sunday, July 22, 2012

UK Parliament Fundraising by Bankers Resolution Names Mitt Romney, specifically


Daily Kos


Fri Jul 20, 2012 at 12:22 AM PDT

UK Parliament Fundraising by Bankers Resolution Names Mitt Romney, specifically


Looks like Mitt Romney's trip to London next week is not going to be the delightful escape from calls for him to release more of his income taxes that he might have hoped it might be. I was just reading an article at the New York Times when this paragraph jumped out at me:
In a sign of just how politicized the scandal has become, 11 members of Parliament recently signed a resolution, naming Mr. Romney, that called for Barclays executives to “cease fund-raising for political candidates” and focus on rebuilding consumer confidence in the banking system.

London Fund-Raisers Put Romney in a Scandal’s Glare
Curious as to what such a resolution actually said, I searched and found it at Parliament's website:
BARCLAYS BANK, LIBOR AND REPUBLICAN DONATIONS 

Session: 2012-13

Date tabled: 16.07.2012


Primary sponsor: Morris, Grahame M


Sponsors: Cunningham, Jim | Durkan, Mark | McDonnell, John | Mearns, Ian | Ritchie, Margaret


That this House notes that Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney is to host a private fundraising dinner in London prior to the Olympics; understands that according to reports in the Financial Times of 3 July tickets to the dinner are being sold at between $25,000 and $75,000 per head; further understands that the event is being chaired by several senior banking executives and lobbyists; further notes that the recently departed Barclays Chief Executive Bob Diamond and other existing senior Barclays executives have played a prominent role in fundraising efforts for the Romney campaign; further understands that at least 15 of Barclays Capital's most senior bankers based in the US have donated the maximum allowable individual donation per election to the Romney campaign; further understands Barclays' Head of Government Policy and Finance group has already raised $927,000 for the Romney campaign; further notes the recent revelation of the destructive role Barclays has played in the international LIBOR-setting scandal; recognises fears that hundreds of thousands of borrowers and mortgage owners in the UK could have been adversely affected; believes that Barclays comprehensively failed to work in the interests of its customers; further believes Barclays senior executives continue to not fully appreciate the consequences of the actions and behaviour of the financial sector in causing the global banking crash in 2007-08, which ordinary working people are now paying for; and calls on Barclays and its executives to cease fundraising for political candidates immediately and to concentrate entirely on repairing confidence and trust in the banking system instead.

 Early day motion 399

A British Political Blog has more:

Co-sponsor of the Early Day Motion, Grahame Morris MP, told Left Foot Forward: “Barclays executives have had their eyes off the ball for too long now. They must now stop fundraising for US Republican candidates and start rebuilding public confidence in the banking system here in the UK which they have done so much harm to.

“Parliament must send a strong message to these banking elites that it is no longer business as usual. Politicians are expressing the outrage felt by the ordinary people we represent.”
Parliamentary motion calls on Barclays’s senior staff to stop fundraising for Romney
The New York Times article reports that Romney will be attending two fundraisers in London that were supposed to be low-key. However, since the LIBOR scandal is dominating the news in London, the fundraisers "are turning into an ill-timed public relations headache for him."  Last week the Boston Globe had more details about Romney's two events in London:
[A]mong those hosting the events is Patrick Durkin, a registered lobbyist for Barclays, which has been at the heart of a rate-fixing scandal. Durkin, who has been a top Romney bundler, is one of seven chairs for the reception and among the 13 co-chairs for the dinner.

Others involved in hosting the events are Dwight Poler, managing director at the European branch of Bain Capital, the firm Romney founded; Raj Bhattacharyya, managing director at Deutsche Bank; and Dan Bricken, a managing director at Wells Fargo Securities.

Among the others involved are Woody Johnson, the owner of the New York Jets; Eric Varvel, the chief executive officer of Bank of Credit Suisse; and Gregg Lemkau, who is the Goldman Sachs head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
London is one of the world banking hubs, with plenty of Americans who are involved in the securities and investment industries that Romney has targeted. This is Romney’s second trip to London to raise money for his presidential campaign.

Mitt Romney plans two London fundraisers on the eve of the Olympics
Headaches at home, headaches abroad. Doesn't seem like Mitt Romney can catch a break. Well, perhaps he will be able to relax a little when he watches his horse perform in the Olympics.

Romney 'Goes for the Gold' in London's Libor Village





Romney 'Goes for the Gold' in London's Libor Village

London—In fairness to Mitt Romney, he did not schedule his $75,000-a-plate money grab at the altar of international finance when he heard that—via the Libor bank-rate scandal—Londoners were practicing his kind of crony capitalism.

Even before the Bain capitalist knew that bankers in London were lying to regulators and fixing interest rates in order to run up their profits—engaging in activities that the governor of the Bank of England said “meet my definition of fraud”—Romney was excited about getting a piece of the London bankster action.

But Romney campaign has has gone to Olympian lengths to make their candidate’s British sojourn seem to be about something other than the looting of London.

The Republican presidential contender’s international fundraising operation—and, yes, he does have an international fundraising operation—scheduled two major events to coincide with the opening of the Olympic Games. As a candidate who is having trouble touting his business experience (Bain Vulture Capital) and his governing experience (RomneyCare), the presumptive Republican presidential nominee calculated that it might be a good idea to take a trip across the pond to highlight his (somewhat less controversial) management of the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City.

The Olympics are being held this year in east London, just beyond the fabled “City” precincts which are, along with New York’s Wall Street, the nerve center of global banking and financial dealmaking. And Romney is using his London sojourn to skim off some cash—make that a lot of cash—for his campaign accounts.

Or, as London’s Independent headlines the story: “Romney Goes for the Gold in London.”

Romney Victory Inc., the incredibly complex fundraising structure the candidate has developed to funnel money into his many campaign operations, has scheduled two London events for July 26:

1. A meet-and-greet where the price of admission is $2,500 per person.

2. A dinner where the places at the tables go for as much as $75,000 per person.

Both the Romney and Obama campaigns have raised money overseas from American expatriates (who, along with Green Card holders, are allowed to donate to US campaigns even if they do not reside in the United States or work for US-based banks or corporations). Obama’s had the upper hand in the global fundraising race by a $3.1 million to $1.4 million margin. But that will change after Romney collects his London haul.

Why? Because Romney is getting together with with The City’s wealthiest, and most scandal-plagued, banksters.

Or, at least, most of them.

Bob Diamond, the former Barclay’s banking empire chief executive who was forced to resign after it was revealed that his bank manipulated the Libor (London InterBank Offered Rate) with false reports about interest rates, was supposed to be at the head of the table. But with his busy schedule of testimony before parliamentary committees and investigators of the biggest banking scandal in recent years, the American expatriate has been forced to absent himself from the festivities.

“Mr. Diamond decided to step aside as a co-host for the upcoming London reception to focus all his attention on Barclays,” the Romney camp announced. “We respect his decision.”

Why shouldn’t they? One of Diamond’s closest lieutenants at Barclays—which just paid $453 million in fines stemming from the Libor scandal—is still co-chairing Romney’s big-ticket event in London.

Barclay’s lobbyist Patrick Durkin’s name is right there at the top of the invite to “a private dinner with Governor Mitt Romney at a central London location.”
Also on the list of forty-seven co-chairs of Romney’s London fundraisers are the names of top players in other banks that have been targets of the interest-rate manipulation scandal, including:

* Bank of Credit Suisse chief executive Eric Varvel (Varvel has already donated $100,000 to Romney’s “Restore Our Future” Super PAC.)
* Deutsche Bank managing director Raj Bhattacharyya
* HSBC managing director Whitfield Hines

Executives from Goldman Sachs, Blackstone and Wells Fargo Securities—and, of course, Bain Capital Europe—are also on the list.

Why would these Americans associated with international banks be giving maximum money to this particular presidential candidate? Gee, could it have anything to do with the fact that there are calls for criminal prosecution of the bankers who were involved in interest rate manipulations that effectively rigged the rates that helped to determine who consumers in the United States and other countries obtained mortgages and paid on credit cards?

“Much more needs to be done,” Senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and Jack Reed( D-RI) and ten of their colleagues wrote in a mid-July letter to financial regulators and Attorney General Eric Holder. “Banks and their employees found to have broken the law should face appropriate criminal prosecution and civil action.”
Electing a friendly president, who might put the brakes on those prosecutions, just became a very high priority for the men who pull the financial strings not just on Wall Street but in London.

Approached by Britain’s Telegraph, one invitee hailed Romney’s “American understanding of capitalism. A prominent lawyer who will be attending one of Romney’s London bashes explained that the Republican candidate understands “very important things [that] people here in the UK also understand.”

That sort of “understanding” is worth a lot to embattled bankers. Certainly, the $75,000 it will cost for what the Independent describes as a “chance to whisper some of their own policy preferences into the ear of the man who may—or may not—be US president.”

Friday, July 20, 2012

Mitt Romney’s Economic Plan Promises to Make a lot of People Suffer

 

 



Mitt Romney’s Economic Plan Promises to Make a lot of People Suffer









 







It is a fair assumption that many Americans really lack a comprehensive understanding of the nation’s economy as it relates to their everyday lives and financial well-being. For most Americans, a secure living-wage job with benefits, a home, and a decent retirement plan defines a personal thriving economy, but after Republican deregulation and investment banker malfeasance during the Bush administration, only the ultra-wealthy live in a thriving economy. Indeed, as the world’s economy came crashing down in 2008, the one-percent of income earners did thrive, and they have since adding to their personal fortunes at the expense of millions of Americans’ jobs, homes, and pension funds. In the race for the White House, Willard Romney promises to recreate the “thriving economy” that cost millions of Americans their jobs and financial security, and he admitted that in order to restore the Bush administration’s thriving economy, millions of Americans are going to suffer. Romney has been secretive about his economic plans for America, and despite mounting questions regarding plans to help average Americans, his message, like his wife’s, is “we’ve given all you people need to know” about a thriving economy.

It is becoming increasingly evident that Romney’s “creative destruction” model of wealth creation for himself and wealthy investors does not include a thriving economy for average Americans. During his storied tenure as head of Bain Capital, he sought out vulnerable companies, took them over, sent jobs overseas, and leveraged them with crushing debt they could hardly manage. Prior to companies going bankrupt, Bain ravaged pension funds, sold off assets that profited Bain, and lured gullible investors into buying into the “restructured companies” before they were closed for good. If companies did manage to remain open, employees lost union representation, living wages, benefits, and pensions they paid into their entire working lives. The result was a thriving economy for Romney and Bain, while shareholders, commercial banks, and employees were left with next-to-nothing if they were fortunate, and destitute if Willard’s thriving economy was completely successful.

Romney cannot claim he was unaware of the devastating effects on employees and communities because he said, “For an economy to thrive, there are a lot of people who will suffer as a result of that,” and that “it’s important to find ways to help people move through this process of losing a job and finding a position in a new type of industry that is growing.” It is a nice sentiment, but there was nothing then, or now in Romney’s plan for America that remotely includes helping people who are not wealthy. In fact, it is no secret he plans to cut education funding, training programs, push private, for-profit schools, cut higher education funding, and slash social safety nets that would be crucial for unemployed workers seeking a job in a new type of industry that is growing.
While head of Bain, Romney invested heavily in new types of industries such as a Chinese manufacturing company that depended on American outsourcing for its profits, and it contradicts Romney’s claim that if president he “will not let China continue to steal jobs from the United States of America.” It is another nice sound-bite on the campaign trail, but outsourcing jobs is entirely different from China “stealing jobs from the United States of America.” In another deal with a new type of industry that is growing, Romney and Bain invested in a company that acknowledged its strategy was to profit from American companies that outsourced production overseas. So it is true that Romney helped workers seeking jobs in a “new type of industry,” but the workers were Chinese and not Americans, and as Romney’s personal economy thrived, Americans languished without jobs, homes, benefits, or retirement savings. For the record, these two examples occurred in 1998 before Willard lied and claimed he was retroactively retired from Bain Capital.

Romney promises that his Bain predatory investment experience gives him an insight in how to turn around the economy with jobs and deficit reduction.
However, the massive tax cuts for the richest 1/10th of 1% of Americans will increase the deficit to a degree that will send the economy over the cliff. On Wednesday a Romney advisor was asked how Willard’s plan would boost economic growth while balancing the budget and reducing the deficit and his advisor was clueless, but said Americans could research his plan to find the answer. The problem for Americans, and Romney, is that there are no plans, and no answers regarding deficit reduction or job creation. What Romney has promised is to “get government out of the way” of job creators with deregulation, repeal the Affordable Care Act, and eliminate Frank-Dodd financial reform that protects consumers from predatory lenders Bain Capital used to leverage struggling companies with insurmountable debt.

As far as jobs, Romney promises to slash teacher, construction, police, firefighter, and other public sector jobs in an effort to dismantle unions. The result is a workforce making minimum wages that just might reach Romney’s grand vision of a $19,000 annual middle-class income that’s $4,000 less than the 2012 federal poverty threshold. Corporations and investors will continue enjoying their thriving economy, and public sector employees will join the ranks of millions of other Americans living at or near poverty. All the while, the wealthy will reap rewards with trillions in tax cuts that Draconian cuts to social safety nets will never make up for, and the nation’s debt will skyrocket. Americans, and the nation’s economy, will comprehend what Romney meant that “a lot of people will suffer” with no hope of recouping their jobs, benefits, homes, or retirement inherent in a vibrant middle-class economy.

Romney’s proposals will help the wealthy’s economy thrive, but like the Bush economy, millions of Americans will suffer and it brings up an important point. It was the Romney and Bain creative destruction model that helped send the world’s economy near the brink of collapse in 2008, and if any American needs to put a face on the Great Recession, they should look no further than Willard Romney. The disregard for employees, communities, and America’s economy is characterized by the Romney’s of the world who measure a thriving economy by their success at acquiring staggering wealth, and if his tenure at Bain Capital is any indication, he will pursue a course that enriches the wealthy and leaves the masses in America competing for jobs in China, South Korea, and India where a good middle class wage is a dollar-an-hour and the prospect of owning a home depends on the size of tent one can afford, and if that is Willard’s idea of a thriving economy, then it make sense why his wife refers to Americans as “you people.”